|
The world is divided into two groups: The labor
group is composed of workers who are willing to
strike in order to take more from their employer
companies for the same or less effort. The mind group is composed of owners,
inventors, entrepreneurs, and managers who
devise, operate, and run the companies that employ
the labor group to perform the tasks devised by the
mind group. |
|
During the 20th century
labor gained a voice and fought en masse against
owners and managements. The tool they used against
the mind group is the strike or the strike threat.
The labor group can go on strike to damage the
companies that pay them wages and benefits. |
|
Over the last eight decades, labor groups have successfully
intimidated, shut down, and cost enough in
production and profits that mind groups
learned to surrender to labor groups' demands. To prevent or
end a strike, mind groups increased benefits and
wages for labor groups. |
|
During the 20th century, the strike developed into a
legitimatized tool. It grew in to protected status by federal law to the
point that often the mere threat of calling a strike
would force mind groups to back down and
give in to worker groups' demands. |
|
|
Mind groups have
intrinsic
need and desire to promote efficient operation of
their companies. They prefer to prevent damage from
being inflicted upon their companies. Mind groups
understand that they are critical to the daily
efficient operation of their companies. They are at
least as needed as the
worker groups. Actually they are more critical. If
mind groups never existed, labor groups would have
only shovel-ready jobs, not manufacturing jobs. But
who would -- or could -- design, develop, and
manufacture the shovels? |
|
But mind groups are
self-constrained, prevented by logic, and understand
that the best interests of their companies and
labor groups mandate them to ensure uninterrupted,
efficient operations. Therefore
mind groups know that they should not strike. |
|
Mind groups
understand that if they want to improve operations,
productivity, profits, working conditions, or nearly
any aspect of any company, they must remain on the
job, work to devise improvements, implement those
plans, verify that there is improvement, and tune
those improvements. Mind groups must be performing their jobs to ensure
that companies operate and improve
operations, productivity, and products. |
|
|
Today in America labor groups have become shielded and empowered by federal and state laws.
Labor groups understand this and act with omnipotence. Whether they
demand higher wages, fewer work hours, more
benefits, or changed working conditions, they stand
prepared to strike in the name of improving
something for themselves with increased cost to their employer
companies. |
|
Going on strike is antithetical to the mind group.
People who have and use minds understand that
they ethically cannot strike. If mind groups were to
strike, they would damage their companies as well as
labor groups. Without mind groups to invent, operate
the back-office, and manage labor groups,
companies would be less able to produce,
less productive, and eventually shut
down totally. |
|
The mind group cannot go on strike. Its strike would
have immediate detrimental impacts upon product
development, marketing, finance, productivity,
operations, and eventually cause permanent
stoppage of all company operations. Mind groups
cannot be replaced. |
|
Labor groups can go on strike.
Their strike may
temporarily slow or stop companies' operations.
A strike by a labor group will strangle -- but not kill
-- a company in the near-term. Labor groups can be
replaced. |
|
Labor groups and their protector, the government (which exists only with the votes of labor groups)
understand that mind groups are trapped in an
ethical
conundrum. |
|
Labor groups, operating in concert with the
government, have no fear of mind groups. Labor
groups know that they can always call in the
government to fight mind groups and protect labor
from mind group work standards and rules. Labor
groups can call upon government to force mind
groups to accede to their demands. |
|
|
Mind groups were doomed. Before today's minds went
on strike, they were forced to stand passively.
Minds were forced to accept labor (and government)
demands.
They had
little recourse
beyond observing further damage and destruction
inflicted upon their companies by labor groups'
demands for more of their companies'
efficiencies, profitability, and productivity. |
|
Little recourse, that is, until the global financial
stoppage. This macro event labeled a crisis by
politicians and labor is actually a mind strike. It is mind
groups' way of going on strike. Minds have withdrawn
their capital from labor. |
|
Investment is slowing, credit is evaporating, and --
therefore -- labor is losing its jobs. Governments
are near-powerless to force minds into investment
and credit expansion. Governments' last tool is
nationalization. Nationalization brings
bureaucracies and inefficiencies and can never
replace efficiencies of minds. |
|
This strike is shaping up to be the
Great Equalizer. Mind groups everywhere are on
strike. Mind groups have begun an effective global stoppage of business
activity. |
|
Labor likely will never understand -- and minds are
powerless to explain to labor -- but it should be
apparent to all who possess a mind how very, very
delicate is the smooth flow of business activity.
All business activity is dependent within
intertwined detail upon all other business activity.
Damage an industry in the global economy and labor
and mind groups will see all industries of commerce
collapse like houses of cards. |
|
Today's Great Strike will hold efficient business
activities hostage. It will force minds and labor to
cooperate within capitalism or cease making progress
under socialism. |